What is Fracking?
Shale gas is natural gas formed underground in fine-grained sedimentary rock formations. The extraction process is called hydraulic fracturing or ‘fracking’ which involves drilling long horizontal wells in shale rocks deep below the surface. Massive quantities of water, sand and chemicals are pumped into the wells at high pressure. This opens up deep cracks in the rock releasing the gas which can then be collected and stored.

 

 

Why does it matter? – International issues
Those in favour of the process argue we need to take advantage of the world’s potentially vast shale gas deposits as an alternative to Coal and to try to keep energy prices down. However there is now serious evidence that Shale Gas is as bad for the environment as burning coal. This is not only the act of burning the gas, but also the environmental impact of the act of extraction.
The UK also has the single biggest known reserve in the world, found by Cuadrilla (an exploration company) deep below Lancashire; there is thought to be a reserve of 200 trillion cubic feet of gas. If correct, this makes Blackpool a lynchpin in the global gas market and if extracted will be a big step back from a decarbonised future. The independent Climate Change committee has warned that if the Government pursues a surge in investment into gas (including Shale) that the UK will be unable to meet the legally binding targets set out in the Climate Change Act (thanks to RTCC for this info and additional comment from Business Green here)

Burning natural gas for energy and heat does produce less CO2 and other pollutants than using coal or oil. It is for this reason that some like George Osborne and the gas industry argue that fracking and an increase in gas use is a positive alternative on our path to a cleaner future instead of coal while we invest in renewables. However there is evidence that large amounts of methane seeping up from the fracking is unable to be captured and simply escapes into the atmosphere. Secondly there’s no evidence that extra natural gas supplies will reduce global coal use. A recent Tyndall Centre report concluded that, without global action to create a carbon cap, developing more gas deposits will mean more fossil fuel us and higher emissions.

A step towards further fracking in Europe is a further step away from the cleaner future we want, as the climate change committee has warned, a further focus on gas takes us back in the wrong direction and is fundamentally unfair to future generations and the half of the world under 30 who will have to live with the decisions of today’s policy makers. It will also ensure that we miss the carbon targets that are bound into law and mean that Europe cannot lead on Climate Policy.

Why does it matter? – Local Issues
Fracking has both local and international impacts. Some of the most high profile media coverage has been on the local impacts of fracking. This is based both on the potential for drinking water supplies to be contaminated by methane or drilling chemicals, this danger has been accepted by the Environmental Protection Agency in the USA  although it has been concluded by amongst others the Energy and Climate change committee that fracking wasn’t more damaging than conventional oil and gas drilling all drilling has environmental risks. Other local environmental concerns include the massive quantities of water and chemicals that are pumped underground as a result of this process and waste water that is left behind and the risk of earthquakes in very rare circumstances.

Fracking in the future
There is a high level of debate across Europe between those who on one side believe that fracking could give us an easy path to energy security because of the large supplies thought to be under our earth. Currently there is no EU wide legislation covering Fracking and reports due out at the end of October will shape the European response. Countries like Poland with significant reserves will fight hard for loose legislation so that Shale can become an increasingly larger part of the energy mix. On the other side France is leading the resistance to fracking among European states saying his government will not pursue Fracking as a source of natural gas.

Until recent years, fracking was only seen in the US and therefore we have the most evidence of its impact from there and according to an IEA report accounted for nearly 60% of total production of gas in 2010 and North America still accounts for the majority of Shale gas production worldwide and this growth will continue in the coming decades as Industry and the Government attempt to convince a sceptical public that fracking is safe.

We will continue to see Industry and Governments worldwide attempt to put forth fracking as a way to boost gas production, phase out coal and reduce our carbon emissions but the evidence that fracking is better for the climate than Coal and other fossil fuels is dubious given the reports on the high levels of methane leakage and the sheer scale of gas supplies means that if we step down the route of increased gas use it is very unlikely we will be able to move towards a cleaner future and see an end of the use of Victorian technology producing our energy with fossil fuels. It will also mean less investment in the modern technologies that should be increasingly our renewables output and ensuring a source of clean energy for future generations.

References and Further reading

http://www.worldwiseinvestor.com/news/article/189/Sarasin-engage-with-shale-gas-industry – This is an outline of fracking from an investment perspective looking at the potential environmental impact.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/info/interactive/2012/apr/12/explainer-test-3 – useful Guardian guide to fracking and some of the debates around it.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/damian-carrington-blog/2011/sep/23/cuadrilla-shale-gas-uk-energy – This Guardian Article outlines how Cuadrilla wants to frack gas from under Blackpool.
http://www.carbonbrief.org/blog/2012/09/europes-shale-gas-battles – A Carbon Briefing blog outlining the state of fracking in Europe.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHQu3SeUwUI – video by some students in the USA about the issues around Fracking.


  • Striebs

    Gas is going to be heating our homes for decades no matter how electricity is generated . It will probably be powering more of our road transport too as it is in Germany .

    The argument becomes whether we produce our own or continue to import more and more of it .

    If produce more of our own then it makes sense to tap onshore resources in source rocks like shale .

    Given the diversity of operators working in the U.S. , the lax regulation out there , terrier like legal profession and number of rural dwellings reliant on well water , if there was serious and widespread pollution of groundwater there would be cases springing up everywhere and there aren’t .

    All that is required for shale hydrocarbons to be produced in Europe is for regulations to be enhanced and documented . Unfortunately there don’t seem to be many doers in DECC , the introduction of the CC part has politicised it so much that they seem incapable of doing anything any more , only slowing things down or stopping them .

    Allowing companies to produce shale won’t slow down adoption of renewables . Having to be viable without subsidies will stimulate that industry . Solar PV will be so much better and cheaper in 10-20 years that everyone will be installing it . Todays panels will look like 1990′s mobile phones .

    Surely it has got to be better to have British workers producing British gas with the companies paying royalties and tax to the British govt than sending all this borrowed money abroad ?

    I’d like to see the lions share reserved for domestic consumption and only the minimum made available to the European central market . Besides , they’ve got more gas than we have in countries like France with associated liquids at that .

    • http://www.ukcc.org Nick Beall

      Hi Striebs,

      Sorry I wasn’t necessarily clear enough, My argument in the blog essentially is that we should not oppose fracking on the basis of local environmental impacts, rather we should oppose it on its national environmental impacts. I disagree with your premise that the argument is whether we import more or produce more, if we as the UK and EU exploit more gas reserves and increase the supply of gas in the coming years it will likely bring down the cost of gas and make fossil fuels continue to be cheaper and deter investment in renewable energy sources. In my blog I referenced the Tyndale report which suggests that as we currently don’t have any international action to cap carbon emissions that exploiting Shale Gas will not lessen fossil fuel use elsewhere and will simply add to overall use. Second to this argument is the fact that we do not know that Shale Gas extraction produces a cleaner fuel even that Coal if you take into account the escaping methane (see here http://www.nature.com/news/air-sampling-reveals-high-emissions-from-gas-field-1.9982)

      Shale gas is a resource we cannot afford to tap into if we are to fight back catastrophic climate change. If we begin to use this resource, it will prove very difficult to put the genie back in the bottle.

  • Nick Beall

    Hi Striebs,

    Sorry I wasn’t necessarily clear enough, My argument in the blog essentially is that we should not oppose fracking on the basis of local environmental impacts, rather we should oppose it on its national environmental impacts. I disagree with your premise that the argument is whether we import more or produce more, if we as the UK and EU exploit more gas reserves and increase the supply of gas in the coming years it will likely bring down the cost of gas and make fossil fuels continue to be cheaper and deter investment in renewable energy sources. In my blog I referenced the Tyndale report which suggests that as we currently don’t have any international action to cap carbon emissions that exploiting Shale Gas will not lessen fossil fuel use elsewhere and will simply add to overall use. Second to this argument is the fact that we do not know that Shale Gas extraction produces a cleaner fuel even that Coal if you take into account the escaping methane (see here http://www.nature.com/news/air-sampling-reveals-high-emissions-from-gas-field-1.9982)

    Shale gas is a resource we cannot afford to tap into if we are to fight back catastrophic climate change. If we begin to use this resource, it will prove very difficult to put the genie back in the bottle.